Is Climate Change a Chinese Hoax?

Written by Ralph E. Stone. Posted in Environment, Opinion, Politics, Science

Tagged: , ,

Published on December 30, 2016 with 3 Comments

By Ralph E. Stone

December 30, 2016

President-elect Donald Trump has called climate change a Chinese hoax, vowed to dismantle America’s climate and clean energy policies, and appointed climate deniers with ties to the fossil fuel industry to his transition team and Cabinet.  

Trump is looking at quick ways of withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement in spite of international backing for the plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions.  At the Paris climate conference in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first-ever universal, legally binding global climate deal, which sets out a global action plan to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to below 2°C.  The US co-signed the agreement on April 22, 2016.  I fear this will be the beginning of Trump’s reversal of policies designed to curb global warming.

Clearly there is a scientific consensus on global warming. In the scientific field of climate studies, which includes many disciplines, the consensus can be demonstrated by the number of scientists who have stopped arguing about what is causing climate change.  So a consensus in science is different from a political one. There is no vote. Scientists just give up arguing because the sheer weight of evidence is too compelling, the tide too strong to swim against any longer.  “…the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes.”   In other words, more than 97% of scientists working in the disciplines contributing to studies of our climate, accept that climate change is almost certainly being caused by human activities.  Global warming is no longer about science; it is now a political, economic and social debate.

Following his inauguration on January 20, Trump will be president and the Republicans will control the Senate and House, which means that efforts to control global warming will be dead even though the danger to our planet and civilization is real. Moreover, Trump is appointing climate change deniers to important department and cabinet posts:

Scott Pruitt, a longtime adversary of the Environmental Protection Agency – and a close friend of the fossil fuel industry – is to head the EPA. Pruitt claims global warming is “far from settled.”  

Ryan Zinke will be the Secretary of the Department of the Interior who has consistently voted in favor of oil and gas projects on federal lands.  The League of Conservation Voters gave him a lifetime voting scorecard of 3%.  Zinke said the the science behind global warming is not proven.

Rick Perry has been selected by to take over the Department of Energy, the agency he famously wanted to abolish but could not name during his presidential bid in 2012.

Tom Price will take over the Department of Health and Human Services.  He signed a pledge created by Americans for Prosperity, a conservative think-tank funded by the Koch brothers, to oppose climate change prevention legislation.

Do Trump and his soon to be members of his administration really believe that global warming is not real and if it is, it is not because of human activity?   I believe these deniers have made a self-interest political decision, rather than a scientific one.  By denying global warming, they now have an excuse to do little or nothing about it.

Yet there are a number of people who in fact distrust the science community.  For years, global warming deniers have engaged in an effective disinformation campaign to undermined efforts to pass a clean energy bill to curb our addiction to oil and other fossil fuels, resulting in cleaner air, more renewable energy, a stronger dollar, and more innovative industries.  Even if 999 scientists out of 1,000 agreed that the main cause of the increase in global average temperatures in recent history is not because of any natural cycle — although natural cycles do exist — it is because of man, the deniers, of course, would seize on the minority of scientists who do not agree. 

No, Mr. Trump, global warming is not a Chinese hoax and there is too much at stake for us to stay silent and do nothing.

Ralph E. Stone

Ralph E. Stone

I was born in Massachusetts; graduated from Middlebury College and Suffolk Law School; served as an officer in the Vietnam war; retired from the Federal Trade Commission (consumer and antitrust law); travel extensively with my wife Judi; and since retirement involved in domestic violence prevention and consumer issues.

More Posts

  • cardigan

    Interesting that you link to the IPCC summary. Pachauri is a former railway engineer turned economist, with considerable conflict of interest and a raft of false statements to his name. No longer head of IPCC, had to resign and sacked from TERI for sexual harassment of an employee.

    John Broome, economist and philosopher, Dasgupta, economist, Edenhofer, economist, lots more non climate scientists in that listing but I don’t have the time to waste pointing out to you that the whole thing is a farce, but an expensive one.

  • bradfregger

    Ralph, I’m a businessman and lecturer at a local university, my master’s is in Societal Futures from San Jose State University and I’ve been following these “sky is falling” frauds for over 50 years. These idiot scientists’ (Mann) predictions based on their failed hypothesis are never realized, but they keep moving the goal posts (and fiddling with the data) until it’s so far out in the future that chances are they’ll be dead before they are proven wrong once again. Scientific consensus is a problem for society, and there isn’t a real scientist in the world that believes in it. But, with the totally committed support of governments, the media, environmentalists, globslists, and progressives (sorry about the redundancy), this time it’s a grave danger to our socioeconomic health and millions of lives worldwide. Hopefully, this consensus will collapse within the decade (or sooner, God willing), the best research is being done by solar scientists who are on the verge of discovering a direct link between a quiet sun and global cooling. The warmist religious fanatics will probably die holding on to their theories, much like the creationists. However, it is the height of stupidity to make social policy based on unproven, actually failed hypothesis, in this instance, Trump is right.

  • Ralph E. Stone

    Remember Dr. Willie Soon: For years, fossil fuel interests and front groups have attacked climate scientists and legislation to cut carbon pollution using junk science and debunked arguments. See (www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/02/23/no-the-sun-isnt-driving-global-warming/?utm_term=.2f67806b1a15)