Mirkarimi Engages PG&E in Impromptu Prop H Debate
By Luke Thomas
October 10, 2008
An impromptu “respectful” and “professional” debate between Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi and a PG&E employee occurred yesterday during a special meeting of the Haight-Ashbury Neighborhood Council (HANC). HANC held the meeting to consider Proposition H, the San Francisco Clean Energy Act, for its endorsement.
The employee said he feared PG&E workers would lose their jobs if Proposition H is passed in November.
Mirkarimi countered that Proposition H is simply a charter amendment that seeks to examine the feasibility of municipalizing San Francisco’s energy production, incrementally advancing San Francisco to a 100 percent clean energy portfolio by 2040.
Proposition H is “our gateway to finding answers that are blessed by the City’s constitution so that it’s meaningful and has teeth, and it’s binding and it’s obligatory,” Mirkarimi said during a Prop H fundraiser billed as a “Green Note Jazz Mixer,” held at the Poleng Lounge immediately following the HANC endorsement meeting. “We’re doing what cities throughout California have done to say that we want to deliver the best energy from a renewable source at cheaper rates.”
Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, who attended the fundraiser, said: “As incompetent as your government may be, it doesn’t have a profit motive, it doesn’t pay its executives $30 million when they’re in bankruptcy.”
“If you write your check to (P)igs, (G)reed and (E)xtortion, they’ll cash it,” Peskin added. “We have an unparalleled opportunity to take the greed and the profit motive and return a resource that is fundamentally the resource of all of us, back to us.”
More Info
Power Struggle – How the best-laid plans of John Edward Raker and the U.S. Congress were scuttled by PG&E: A chronology, 1848–1988
Filed under: Energy, Environment, News, Politics
Email This Article
Print This Article
2 Responses to “Mirkarimi Engages PG&E in Impromptu Prop H Debate”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
- No Surrender: Occupy DC Protesters Return to McPherson Square
- Judge Denies Mirkarimi Request to Lift Stay Away Order, Expedites Hearing
- Park Police Raid OccupyDC, Dismantle Tents of Dreams
- Occupy DC: A Warm Place for Protest <br>in the Heart of Wintertime Washington
- Doomsday Clock: Five Minutes to Midnight
- Collection Agency Picked On the Wrong Lou Correa
- Group Seeks Condo Lottery Bypass, <br>Raise Funds for Affordable Housing
- Bill Would End Journalist Lockout at State Prisons
- Michael Goldstein Remembered
- Herrera Files Lawsuits Against Tenderloin Markets <br>for Alleged Facilitation of Drugs Trafficking
- Violent Clashes with Police <br>Mar Occupy Oakland Move-In Day
- San Francisco Legitimizes Urban Farming
- Remembering Vietnam
- Judge Refuses Change to Mirkarimi Stay Away Order, Prosecutor Reveals Lopez Messages
- Sheriff Mirkarimi's Trial Date Set, <br>Attorney Says Case "Overblown", <br>Second Woman Files Complaint
- Hundreds Celebrate Life of Labor Leader Walter Johnson
- Occupy West Protesters Decry Bank Foreclosures, Corporate Personhood
- Occupy Wall Street West Ends Hibernation <br>in Quest to Right America
- Mirkarimi Pleads Not Guilty, <br>Court Extends Protective Order
- Campos Draws Broad-Based Support for Re-Election Bid
Yes our Water rates are cheap, and that goes along way to explain why there is a water shortage. If we were charged more may be we would all use less? Local government has a responsibility to control water usage and we should charge all users appropriately to reduce our water usage. So the argument that they can run a Water utility is incorrect, they are not running it responsibly. Mirkarimi’s argument is so ass backward it’s embarrassing, I thought he was a member of the Green Party, he should be shouting from the roof tops to stop our water usage, not stating the management of our water as efficient.
On to Penskin quote: “What’s this rhetoric about City Government can’t do it?†Has he ever traveled on MUNI, if not may be he’s been lucky and his car suspension has not broken on the Pot Holes? Clearly he lives in a different city to me. In the past may be San Francisco was a City that could manage large projects today San Francisco is a shameful shadow of its former self.
Trying to tie the current BOS with good government decisions made more than 70 years ago isn’t just a stretch it is a drunkard’s rambling yarn.
I think that every dollar spent by PG & E to fend off the City Hall pigs is money well spent. That money however is essentially paid by rate payers so please Mr Peskin when you get your stupid idea slapped back in your face, please don’t be in too much of a hurry to ramp up another campaign to stick it to those of us who have to pay for electricity . I’m happy that City Hall isn’t involved in the process.