Home   Google ARCHIVE SEARCH: Date:

Automakers ask judge
to dismiss global warming lawsuit

By Julia Cheever, Bay City News Service


March 6, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO (BCN) - Six leading American and Japanese automakers asked a federal judge in San Francisco today to dismiss a public nuisance lawsuit filed against them by the state of California over global warming.

The car manufacturers' lawyer, Theodore Boutrous, argued to U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins that the case doesn't belong in court because global warming is a policy issue.

"Global warming is fraught with economic, political and social issues of global significance," Boutrous said.

"This is a classic case where this is a political issue," he said.

The attorney also said the lawsuit interferes with U.S. foreign policy on global warming. Jenkins took the case under submission and will issue a written ruling at a later date.

The unusual lawsuit is based on the legal theory that carbon dioxide, a so-called "greenhouse gas," emitted by automobiles is a public nuisance because it contributes to global warming.

It alleges the six automakers are responsible for 30 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted in California. It seeks compensation for the alleged millions of dollars that global warming costs the state because of increased flooding, coastline erosion and harm to public health during more frequent extreme hot weather.

The lawsuit was filed in September by then-Attorney General Bill Lockyer and has been continued by his successor, Jerry Brown. The defendants are General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Motors Corp., Toyota Motor North America Inc., Honda North America and Nissan North America.

The automakers also contend the nuisance claim shouldn't be allowed because it is pre empted by federal laws regulating vehicle pollution, including the Clean Air Act.

But Deputy California Attorney General Ken Alex told the judge the Clean Air act generally does not regulate carbon dioxide and thus should not displace the nuisance lawsuit.

"We have a massive issue about which this statute is pretty much silent. It's not a comprehensive response to global warming," Alex argued.

Copyright © 2007 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

####

EMAIL THIS STORY |PRINT THIS STORY

Sponsors


The Hunger Site

Cooking Classes
in Buenos Aires

Buenos Aires B&B

Calitri in southern Italy

L' Aquila in Abruzzo

Health Insurance Quotes

Blogroll:

Bruce Brugmann's
Blog

Calitics

Civic Center
Blogspot

Dan Noyes
I-Team

Greg Dewar

Griper Blade

LeftinSF

Malik Looper

KPFA

KPOO

KQED

KTEH

MetroBloggingSF

MetroWize Urban Guide

Michael Moore

N Judah Chronicles

PelosiWatch

Robert Solis
Blogspot

SF Bay Guardian
Politics

SFBulldog

SFLuxe

SFPartyParty

SFWeekly

SFWillie's Blog

SF/Unscripted

StarkedSF

Sweet Melissa

TheDalyBlog