Verdict clears Fallay of minor corruption charges
              Jury "hopelessly deadlocked" on remaining 
                charges, 
                forces mistrial
                
                Former San Francisco Department of Building Inspection manager 
                Augustine Fallay was today cleared of four of thirty-three counts 
                of bribery, perjury and insurance fraud charges. The jury remained 
                deadlocked on 29 charges, forcing a mistrial. 
                 Photo(s) by  
Luke Thomas
               
               By Luke 
                Thomas 
                
                May 15, 2007
              Jurors in the criminal trial of former Department of Building 
                Inspector, Augustine Fallay, returned a verdict of not guilty 
                today on four of thirty-three counts of bribery, perjury, and 
                insurance fraud. 
              Fallay, 49, was cleared of three minor counts of bribery stemming 
                from meals paid for by former real estate developer and "loan 
                specialist" Tony Fu, and one count of insurance fraud. 
              Fallay was arrested in August 2005 and faced more than 20 years 
                in prison if convicted. Prosecutors charged that Fallay solicited 
                and accepted bribes over 12 years, including a $50,000 loan, payments 
                of cash and services for home improvements and meals.  
              His attorney, Randy Knox, argued his client was set up by Fu, 
                an unscrupulous loan broker who blackmailed Fallay after the building 
                inspection manager refused to grant him favors. 
              Following the 9-week trial that included testimony from as many 
                as fourty witnesses, jurors were "hopelessly deadlocked" 
                during deliberations on the remaining 29 counts, which included 
                two serious charges of bribery related to the $50,000 loan Fallay 
                never repaid. 
              Assistant District Attorney spokesperson June Cravett, speaking 
                to reporters immediately following the verdict said: "The 
                office at this point will take a look at the evidence, take a 
                look at the jury's comments, and we have to evaluate what to do 
                in terms of further proceedings in the matter." 
                
                Assistant District Attorney spokesperson June Cravett  
              "To not have a resolution at the end of the day, and certainly 
                from the prosecution's point, a conviction on all of the important 
                counts, certainly is a disappointment," Cravett added. 
              But, according to juror Bill Wise, Fu's credibility "was 
                the weak point for the prosecution." 
              "I think the jury in general did not deem him credible," 
                Wise said. 
                
                Tony Fu 
              Fu was the prosecution's star witness. Assistant District Attorney 
                Mark Katz argued in his closing statement that despite Fu's lack 
                of credibility, Fallay was "Fu's lifeline at DBI" and 
                referred to the $50,000 loan as a "sweetheart loan." 
                
                Assistant District Attorney Marc Katz 
              Wise told reporters that at the beginning of the trial he believed 
                the $50,000 loan to Fallay from Fu's former business partner, 
                Demas Yan, was a bribe. But Wise said he changed his mind when 
                he heard FBI recordings of Fallay telling Fu that he intended 
                to pay back the loan following the assignment of the loan to Fu's 
                former wife, Crystal Lei. 
              "On the main charge of bribery, there was a preponderance 
                for not guilty," Wise said. 
              Commenting on Fallay's reaction to the verdict, Knox said: "He's 
                relieved, but he fully expected to be vindicated at the end of 
                the day. And he was on those four counts, but those four counts 
                are four of thirty-three counts." 
                
                Defense Attorney Randall Knox 
              Although a decision by prosecutors has not yet been made to retry 
                the case, lawyers on both sides are anticipating a retrial. 
              A setting hearing is scheduled before Judge Earnest Goldsmith 
                in two weeks. 
              Tamara Barak contributed to this report. 
              #### 
               
                
                
               
              
              
             |